Should single-stage PEG buttons become the procedure of choice for PEG placement in children
Background Single-stage PEG buttons (PEG-B) allow initial placement of a skin-level gastrostomy device for children who require enteral access. They offer significant advantages over traditionally placed PEG tubes (PEG-T) but have not been widely accepted into practice. Objective To review our exper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2006-09, Vol.64 (3), p.320-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Single-stage PEG buttons (PEG-B) allow initial placement of a skin-level gastrostomy device for children who require enteral access. They offer significant advantages over traditionally placed PEG tubes (PEG-T) but have not been widely accepted into practice. Objective To review our experience with PEG-Bs compared with PEG-Ts. Hypothesis PEG-B shares a similar safety profile with PEG-T but delays the need for an initial device change well beyond the change that usually occurs at 6 to 8 weeks after PEG-T placement. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. Patients All children undergoing both PEG procedures and attending our clinic from 1997 to 2002. Main Outcome Measurements Age, sex, weight, indications, postoperative complications, interval till first tube change and first tube change complications. Results Totals of 145 and 93 patients were identified in the PEG-B and PEG-T groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in the 2 groups with respect to age, weight, indications, and postoperative complications. The interval till first tube change, however, was significantly longer in the PEG-B group (314 days) than in the PEG-T (78 days) ( P < .0001). In addition, the PEG-B was found to be as safe as the PEG-T for small infants who weighed less than 5 kg. Conclusions PEG-B placement should be considered as the procedure of choice over PEG-T placement for children. It offers similar safety profiles, even for small patients and a significantly longer interval till first device change. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.042 |