Energy landscape of k-point mutants of an RNA molecule

Motivation: A k-point mutant of a given RNA sequence s = s1, …, sn is an RNA sequence s ′ = s 1 ′ , … , s n ′ obtained by mutating exactly k-positions in s; i.e. Hamming distance between s and s′ equals k. To understand the effect of pointwise mutation in RNA, we consider the distribution of energie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioinformatics 2005-11, Vol.21 (22), p.4140-4147
Hauptverfasser: Clote, P., Waldispühl, J., Behzadi, B., Steyaert, J.-M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Motivation: A k-point mutant of a given RNA sequence s = s1, …, sn is an RNA sequence s ′ = s 1 ′ , … , s n ′ obtained by mutating exactly k-positions in s; i.e. Hamming distance between s and s′ equals k. To understand the effect of pointwise mutation in RNA, we consider the distribution of energies of all secondary structures of k-point mutants of a given RNA sequence. Results: Here we describe a novel algorithm to compute the mean and standard deviation of energies of all secondary structures of k-point mutants of a given RNA sequence. We then focus on the tail of the energy distribution and compute, using the algorithm AMSAG, the k-superoptimal structure; i.e. the secondary structure of a ≤k-point mutant having least free energy over all secondary structures of all k′-point mutants of a given RNA sequence, for k′ ≤ k. Evidence is presented that the k-superoptimal secondary structure is often closer, as measured by base pair distance and two additional distance measures, to the secondary structure derived by comparative sequence analysis than that derived by the Zuker minimum free energy structure of the original (wild type or unmutated) RNA. Contact: clote@bc.edu Supplementary information:
ISSN:1367-4803
1460-2059
1367-4811
DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti669