On Adaptation, Maximization, and Reinforcement Learning Among Cognitive Strategies
Analysis of binary choice behavior in iterated tasks with immediate feedback reveals robust deviations from maximization that can be described as indications of 3 effects: (a) a payoff variability effect , in which high payoff variability seems to move choice behavior toward random choice; (b) under...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological review 2005-10, Vol.112 (4), p.912-931 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Analysis of binary
choice behavior in iterated tasks with immediate feedback reveals robust deviations from
maximization that can be described as indications of 3 effects: (a)
a payoff
variability effect
, in which high payoff variability seems to move choice
behavior toward random choice; (b)
underweighting of rare events
, in
which alternatives that yield the best payoffs most of the time are attractive even when
they are associated with a lower expected return; and (c)
loss aversion
,
in which alternatives that minimize the probability of losses can be more attractive than
those that maximize expected payoffs. The results are closer to probability matching than
to maximization. Best approximation is provided with a model of reinforcement learning
among cognitive strategies (RELACS). This model captures the 3 deviations, the learning
curves, and the effect of information on uncertainty avoidance. It outperforms other
models in fitting the data and in predicting behavior in other experiments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.912 |