Preload Independence of Isovolumic Relaxation Flow Propagation Velocity
To evaluate whether isovolumic relaxation flow propagation velocity (IRFPV) is independent of preload alterations, 41 healthy subjects (35 ± 7 years) were included for Doppler examinations at three different positions, i.e., supine, Trendelenburg, and reverse Trendelenburg. A positional difference w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2006-08, Vol.23 (7), p.542-545 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate whether isovolumic relaxation flow propagation velocity (IRFPV) is independent of preload alterations, 41 healthy subjects (35 ± 7 years) were included for Doppler examinations at three different positions, i.e., supine, Trendelenburg, and reverse Trendelenburg. A positional difference was detected in the peak velocity of the transmitral early diastolic flow wave (P = 0.012) and the peak velocities of both early (P = 0.004) and late (P = 0.007) diastolic mitral annular velocity waves. In contrast, there was no positional difference in the early diastolic inflow propagation velocity or IRFPV. In conclusion, IRFPV is a preload‐independent Doppler parameter. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0742-2822 1540-8175 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00259.x |