Preload Independence of Isovolumic Relaxation Flow Propagation Velocity

To evaluate whether isovolumic relaxation flow propagation velocity (IRFPV) is independent of preload alterations, 41 healthy subjects (35 ± 7 years) were included for Doppler examinations at three different positions, i.e., supine, Trendelenburg, and reverse Trendelenburg. A positional difference w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2006-08, Vol.23 (7), p.542-545
Hauptverfasser: Voon, Wen-Chol, Su, Ho-Ming, Yen, Hsueh-Wei, Lin, Tsung-Hsien, Lai, Wen-Ter, Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate whether isovolumic relaxation flow propagation velocity (IRFPV) is independent of preload alterations, 41 healthy subjects (35 ± 7 years) were included for Doppler examinations at three different positions, i.e., supine, Trendelenburg, and reverse Trendelenburg. A positional difference was detected in the peak velocity of the transmitral early diastolic flow wave (P = 0.012) and the peak velocities of both early (P = 0.004) and late (P = 0.007) diastolic mitral annular velocity waves. In contrast, there was no positional difference in the early diastolic inflow propagation velocity or IRFPV. In conclusion, IRFPV is a preload‐independent Doppler parameter.
ISSN:0742-2822
1540-8175
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00259.x