Detection of Burkholderia cepacia DNA from Artificially Infected EDTA-blood and Lung Tissue Comparing Different DNA Isolation Methods
Bacterial DNA (Burkholderia cepacia) was prepared from artificially infected equine ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-blood and lung tissue by using four standard methods (lysis buffer containing proteinase K, phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol-extraction, microwave-treatment, heat treatment) and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B 2006-08, Vol.53 (6), p.281-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Bacterial DNA (Burkholderia cepacia) was prepared from artificially infected equine ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-blood and lung tissue by using four standard methods (lysis buffer containing proteinase K, phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol-extraction, microwave-treatment, heat treatment) and six commercially available kits (Puregene®, High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit®, InstaGene®, QiaAmp Tissue Kit®, DNAzol® and Elu-Quik®). After a subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR), their efficacy and sensitivity were compared. Concerning the detection limits, the simple lysis with a proteinase K-containing buffer led to the best results for EDTA-blood as well as for artificially infected lung tissue. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-1793 1863-1959 1439-0450 1863-2378 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00956.x |