Impact of 1996 Residency Review Committee obstetrics-gynecology primary care requirements on residency training and surgical procedures
This study evaluated the impact of required primary care rotations in obstetrics-gynecology residency training after 1996. A questionnaire was sent to the 1994 to 2003 graduates from 1 residency program, and records of surgical procedures completed during residency were analyzed. Thirty-nine of 46 g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2005-11, Vol.193 (5), p.1870-1873 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study evaluated the impact of required primary care rotations in obstetrics-gynecology residency training after 1996.
A questionnaire was sent to the 1994 to 2003 graduates from 1 residency program, and records of surgical procedures completed during residency were analyzed.
Thirty-nine of 46 graduates participated in the study (response rate 85%). Required primary care training was associated with increased confidence in providing primary care (81.5% versus 54.5%,
P = .12) but less agreement that obstetrics-gynecology is a primary care specialty (21.4% versus 45.5%,
P = .23). Abdominal hysterectomies and vaginal hysterectomies per resident did not decrease (127 versus 113,
P = 0.149, and 55 versus 48,
P = .06, respectively). Adjusted for temporal trends, cesarean sections per resident decreased (366 versus 321,
P = .009).
Residents maintained adequate rates of major inpatient surgical procedures after implementation of required primary care training. There was a tendency for residents who graduated after 1996 to have less favorable attitudes about primary care. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.061 |