Preoperative computed tomography finding predicts for postoperative inguinal hernia: New perspective for radical prostatectomy-related inguinal hernia

To investigate the incidence of radical prostatectomy-related inguinal hernia (RPRIH) and the predictive factors for RPRIH. We reviewed the medical charts of patients who had undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) at our institution from January 2002 to December 2004 and had a median follo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2006-08, Vol.68 (2), p.267-271
Hauptverfasser: Fukuta, Fumimasa, Hisasue, Shin-ichi, Yanase, Masahiro, Kobayashi, Ko, Miyamoto, Shintaro, Kato, Shuichi, Shima, Masaki, Tsukamoto, Taiji, Takatsuka, Keiji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the incidence of radical prostatectomy-related inguinal hernia (RPRIH) and the predictive factors for RPRIH. We reviewed the medical charts of patients who had undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) at our institution from January 2002 to December 2004 and had a median follow-up of 17 months (range 3 to 42). All patients were examined for RPRIH every 3 months. We also reviewed the computed tomography results in a blinded manner and investigated the predictive factors for RPRIH with multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Of 98 patients analyzed, 17 were diagnosed with RPRIH after RRP (17.3%) at the median of 7 months (range 3 to 12). Preoperative computed tomography results were available for all patients, and subclinical inguinal hernia was identified in 20 (20.4%) of the 98 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that a subclinical inguinal hernia was the single predictive factor for RPRIH. The estimated rate of RPRIH was 60.6% in the subclinical inguinal hernia group and 9.5% in the normal group at 12 months (log-rank test, P
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.023