Beta‐Blocker Therapy for Heart Failure: Should the Therapeutic Target Be Dose or Heart Rate Reduction?

Therapeutic target with β blockers in heart failure, i.e., target heart rate reduction or β‐blocker dose, is controversial. To resolve this controversy, the authors studied 152 heart failure patients on β blockers who were divided into four groups based on median peak exercise heart rate reduction a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.) Conn.), 2006-07, Vol.12 (4), p.206-210
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Robert L., Listerman, Jennifer, Goring, Joann, Giesberg, Carrie, Nading, Mary Alice, Butler, Javed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Therapeutic target with β blockers in heart failure, i.e., target heart rate reduction or β‐blocker dose, is controversial. To resolve this controversy, the authors studied 152 heart failure patients on β blockers who were divided into four groups based on median peak exercise heart rate reduction as compared with predicted and prescription of at least 50% recommended β‐blocker dose. Event‐free survival (vs. death or assist device placement or urgent transplantation) was compared. Baseline and peak exercise heart rates were 74±14 and 116±21 bpm, respectively. Median heart rate reduction at peak exercise was 35%. When median or higher peak heart rate reduction was achieved, there were no significant survival differences noted between patients on different β‐blocker doses. With below‐median peak heart rate reduction, there was a strong trend toward better event‐free survival with higher β‐blocker doses. In conclusion, the results suggest that higher heart rate reduction is associated with better outcomes for heart failure patients overall and, for patients with persistently elevated heart rates, higher β‐blocker doses provided additional benefit.
ISSN:1527-5299
1751-7133
DOI:10.1111/j.1527-5299.2006.05477.x