Genetic Testing in an Ethnically Diverse Cohort of High-Risk Women: A Comparative Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in American Families of European and African Ancestry
CONTEXT Ten years after BRCA1 and BRCA2 were first identified as major breast cancer susceptibility genes, the spectrum of mutations and modifiers of risk among many ethnic minorities remain undefined. OBJECTIVES To characterize the clinical predictors, spectrum, and frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mut...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2005-10, Vol.294 (15), p.1925-1933 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Ten years after BRCA1 and BRCA2 were first identified as major breast cancer susceptibility genes,
the spectrum of mutations and modifiers of risk among many ethnic minorities
remain undefined. OBJECTIVES To characterize the clinical predictors, spectrum, and frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an
ethnically diverse high-risk clinic population and to evaluate the performance
of the BRCAPRO statistical model in predicting the likelihood of a mutation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Comparative analysis of families (white, Ashkenazi Jewish, African American,
Hispanic, Asian) with 2 or more cases of breast and/or ovarian cancer among
first- and second-degree relatives. Families were identified at US sites between
February 1992 and May 2003; in each family, the individual with the highest
probability of being a mutation carrier was tested. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
for the BRCAPRO model. RESULTS The mutation spectrum was vastly different between families of African
and European ancestry. Compared with non-Hispanic, non-Jewish whites, African
Americans had a lower rate of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations but a higher rate of sequence variations
(27.9% vs 46.2% and 44.2% vs 11.5%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.294.15.1925 |