Comparison of analgesic activity of the addition to neostigmine and fentanyl to bupivacaine in postoperative epidural analgesia

To compare the analgesic and side effects of bupivacaine in combinations with neostigmine and fentanyl using patient-controlled-epidural analgesia (PCEA) methods in the postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy. Seventy-five adult American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Saudi medical journal 2006-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1199-1203
Hauptverfasser: TEKIN, Selcen, TOPCU, Ismet, EKICI, Neriman Z, CAGLAR, Husnu, ERINCLER, Tuna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the analgesic and side effects of bupivacaine in combinations with neostigmine and fentanyl using patient-controlled-epidural analgesia (PCEA) methods in the postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy. Seventy-five adult American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients, aged 18-65 years were included in the study. The study took place in Celal Bayar University Hospital, Turkey between 2003-2004 years. After preoperative epidural catheterization, the patients were operated under general anesthesia. After surgery, the patients were randomly allocated in a double-blinded manner to receive PCEA and divided into 3 groups: Group B: 0.125% bupivacaine, Group N: 0.125% bupivacaine plus neostigmine 4 ug kg-1 and Group F: 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 ug kg-1 fentanyl solutions (10 mL loading dose, 5 mL bolus dose, 10 min lockout time, 30 mL in 4 hour limit). During the following 24 hours, hemodynamic parameters, pain score using visual analog scale, total analgesic consumption, additional analgesic requirements, sedation, satisfaction, nausea scores and probable side-effects were evaluated. Total analgesic consumption was 143.7 +/- 7.2 mL in Group B, 123.4 +/- 6.2 mL in Group N and 106 +/- 8.3 mL in Groups F. The mean value in Group F was significantly lower than Group N and Group B (p
ISSN:0379-5284