Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendons and Cross-Pin Femoral Fixation Compared With Patellar Tendon Autografts

Purpose: To investigate the outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft using femoral cross-pin fixation compared with patellar tendon autografts. Type of Study: Matched retrospective cohort. Methods: Twenty-one patients who underwent ACL reconstr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2005-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1186-1192
Hauptverfasser: Wilcox, Joseph F., Gross, John A., Sibel, Roman, Backs, Rose A., Kaeding, Christopher C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To investigate the outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft using femoral cross-pin fixation compared with patellar tendon autografts. Type of Study: Matched retrospective cohort. Methods: Twenty-one patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft and femoral cross-pin fixation were evaluated at an average of 16.4 months postoperatively. Subjective data were collected using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Cincinnati Knee Scale. Objective data included a comprehensive knee examination, plain radiographs, and KT-1000 measurements. The results were compared with 19 matched patients who had previously undergone ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Results: The average KT-1000 maximal manual side-to-side difference was 1.63 ± 0.68 mm. Eighty-six percent of IKDC scores were normal or nearly normal. The average overall Cincinnati Knee Scale subjective symptom rating was 8.7 ± 1.2. There was no significant difference in subjective or objective data between the 2 groups. Conclusions: ACL reconstruction using femoral cross-pin fixation is a reliable technique showing outcomes comparable to other established methods of fixation. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
ISSN:0749-8063
1526-3231
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.07.003