Computerized Adaptive Testing for Follow-Up After Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation: I. Activity Outcomes

Haley SM, Siebens H, Coster WJ, Tao W, Black-Schaffer RM, Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Ni P. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2006-08, Vol.87 (8), p.1033-1042
Hauptverfasser: Haley, Stephen M., Siebens, Hilary, Coster, Wendy J., Tao, Wei, Black-Schaffer, Randie M., Gandek, Barbara, Sinclair, Samuel J., Ni, Pengsheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Haley SM, Siebens H, Coster WJ, Tao W, Black-Schaffer RM, Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Ni P. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. Longitudinal, prospective 1-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. Follow-up visits conducted in patients’ home setting. Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. Not applicable. Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77–.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients’ own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time.
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.020