Resistive index and chronic allograft nephropathy evaluated in protocol biopsies as predictors of graft outcome

Introduction. The presence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is negatively associated with graft survival. Although recent studies have indicated that the resistive index (RI) is a predictor of graft failure, it does not correlate with CAN in stable grafts. We therefore stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2005-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2511-2516
Hauptverfasser: Vallejos, Augusto, Alperovich, Gabriela, Moreso, Francesc, Cañas, Concepcion, de Lama, M. Eugenia, Gomà, Montserrat, Fulladosa, Xavier, Carrera, Marta, Hueso, Miguel, Grinyó, Josep M., Serón, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction. The presence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is negatively associated with graft survival. Although recent studies have indicated that the resistive index (RI) is a predictor of graft failure, it does not correlate with CAN in stable grafts. We therefore studied the relationship between RI and CAN and examined the predictive value of both parameters on graft outcome. Methods. Included were patients transplanted between 1997 and 2002 and who had protocol biopsies and RI determinations. Renal lesions were blindly evaluated according to Banff 97 criteria. Mean glomerular volume, cortical interstitial volume fraction and intimal arterial volume fraction were estimated using a point counting technique. RI was determined before biopsy in at least two different renal locations. The outcome variable was defined as graft failure or a 30% serum creatinine increase between protocol biopsy and last follow-up. Results. Eighty-seven patients were included. RI correlated with recipient age (R = 0.52, P
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfi041