Cardiovascular outcome of patients with abnormal coronary vasomotion and normal coronary arteriography is worse in type 2 diabetes mellitus than in arterial hypertension: A 10 year follow-up study
Diabetes and arterial hypertension are major cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary endothelial dysfunction is frequently observed in diabetic and hypertensive patients. This study was designed to compare cardiovascular outcome of hypertensive (HT) and type 2 diabetic patients (D2) with angiographica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atherosclerosis 2005-11, Vol.183 (1), p.113-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Diabetes and arterial hypertension are major cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary endothelial dysfunction is frequently observed in diabetic and hypertensive patients. This study was designed to compare cardiovascular outcome of hypertensive (HT) and type 2 diabetic patients (D2) with angiographically normal coronary arteries on the basis of their epicardial coronary endothelial function. Coronary reactivity assessment by cold-pressor test (CPT) using quantitative coronary angiography was achieved in 65 HT (45 males, 20 females) aged 51.9
±
7.6 years, and in 59 D2 (32 males, 27 females) aged 48.9
±
7.3 years, with angiographically normal coronary arteries and without other major coronary risk factor. Cardiovascular events (CVE) were recorded with a mean follow-up of 108
±
15 months in HT, and 113
±
10 months in D2. During CPT, in HT coronary artery dilation occurred in 10.8% of the patients, no change in 21.5%, and constriction in 67.7%. In D2, dilation occurred in 3.4% of the patients, no change in 18.6%, and constriction in 78.0%. During follow-up, in HT there were nine CVE in 6/65 patients (9.2%), all in the 6/44 (13.6%) patients with coronary artery constriction. In D2, there were 18 CVE in 16/59 patients (27.1%,
P
<
0.01 versus HT), with 17 CVE in the 15/46 patients with coronary artery constriction, and one CVE in the 1/13 patients without constriction (32.6% versus 7.7%). In patients with coronary artery constriction, CVE were more frequent in D2 than in HT (
P
<
0.05). Last, CVE were more severe and occurred earlier in D2 than in HT. In conclusion, epicardial coronary endothelial dysfunction is predictive of long-term CVE in HT and D2 with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Cardiovascular outcome of patients with coronary constriction is worse in D2 than in HT. At the opposite, patients without constriction have good cardiovascular prognosis in both subgroups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9150 1879-1484 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.02.030 |