Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials
To investigate the influence of photoactivation method on degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM) and Knoop hardness (KHN) of a composite and an unfilled resin (Filtek Z250 and Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, 3 M ESPE) after storage in water or ethanol, and on composi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2005-10, Vol.33 (9), p.773-779 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To investigate the influence of photoactivation method on degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM) and Knoop hardness (KHN) of a composite and an unfilled resin (Filtek Z250 and Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, 3
M ESPE) after storage in water or ethanol, and on composite contraction stress (CS).
Specimens 1×2×10
mm were prepared for FS test, photoactivated by 600
mW/cm
2×40
s (A), 200
mW/cm
2×120
s (B), or 600
mW/cm
2×1
s +3
min delay +600
mW/cm
2×39
s (C), and tested after 24
h in water or ethanol. Load and displacement values were used to calculate FM. Specimen fragments were used to measure KHN. DC was determined by FT-Raman spectroscopy. CS was determined by mechanical testing. Data were submitted to ANOVA/Tukey's test (
α=0.05).
Composite DC was not affected by photoactivation (A: 65±1.8%; B: 66±3.4%; C: 65±2.9%). Unfilled resin DC was statistically higher using method A (79±0.3%) than B (74±1.0%) and C (73±0.9%). Photoactivation did not influence composite properties, regardless of the storage medium (
p>0.05). After ethanol storage, FS of the unfilled resin was lower for specimens irradiated by method B (
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.005 |