Immunoglobulin G–Positive in B-Cell Cross-Match Decreases Kidney Allograft Survival
We retrospectively studied all 1149 transplants performed at our center between 1993 and 2003 to determine the incidence and clinical effect of pretransplant B-positive cross-match on kidney graft survival. The patients were divided in two groups: B-negative ( n = 1102) and B-positive in current ser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2005-07, Vol.37 (6), p.2753-2754 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We retrospectively studied all 1149 transplants performed at our center between 1993 and 2003 to determine the incidence and clinical effect of pretransplant B-positive cross-match on kidney graft survival. The patients were divided in two groups: B-negative (
n = 1102) and B-positive in current sera (
n = 47; 4.1%). AB-positive test was more frequent among regrafted patients (14% vs 3%;
P = .00). Demographic data were not different between the groups. The overall rate of graft loss was similar (26% vs 24%, respectively;
P = .86). However, early nonsurgical graft losses were more frequent among B-positive patients (46% vs 20%, respectively;
P = .04). IgM was the most frequent immunoglobulin in the B-positive group (76% IgM and 24% IgG). There was no significant difference between B-negative and B-positive groups in the 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates (87% vs 83%, 73% vs 78%, 64% vs 66%, respectively;
P = .87). The graft survival was significantly reduced comparing an IgG anti-B cell to the B-negative group (
P = .03) as well as IgG compared to IgM (
P = .004). In conclusion, only B-positive cross-match due to IgG decreased graft survival. Even though it is an uncommon situation (0.9%), this study stressed the clinical value of the B-cell cross-match as a tool to identify patients with a higher immunological risk. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.05.042 |