Urinary Retention in a General Rehabilitation Unit: Prevalence, Clinical Outcome, and the Role of Screening

Wu J, Baguley IJ. Urinary retention in a general rehabilitation unit: prevalence, clinical outcome, and the role of screening. To document the prevalence of, risk factors for, and outcomes of, urinary retention (UR). Prospective observational study. A subacute general (predominantly geriatric) rehab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2005-09, Vol.86 (9), p.1772-1777
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Jane, Baguley, Ian J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Wu J, Baguley IJ. Urinary retention in a general rehabilitation unit: prevalence, clinical outcome, and the role of screening. To document the prevalence of, risk factors for, and outcomes of, urinary retention (UR). Prospective observational study. A subacute general (predominantly geriatric) rehabilitation unit. Three hundred nineteen consecutive patients (196 women, 123 men). Twenty-two patients were catheterized for acute UR in the acute facility prior to transfer to rehabilitation. Patients admitted without catheters (n=297) had their postvoid residual (PVR) volumes assessed via a bladder scanner within 72 hours of admission. PVR volumes of 150mL or more were considered abnormal. PVR volumes in the 297 “asymptomatic” patients were 150mL or more in 64 (21.5%) patients. The risk of UR was greatest among male patients who had lower admission FIM instrument scores, neurologic disorders (eg, stroke or multiple sclerosis), cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, a history of previous prostate, bladder, or voiding problems, were taking anticholinergic medications, or were immobile. Patients with UR were significantly more likely to have a urinary tract infection at admission, have urinary incontinence on discharge, and to be discharged with referrals for community services for personal care or to residential care. Although patients with UR on admission had a lower discharge FIM score, they generally showed a greater degree of improvement in their FIM scores during their stay. Clinically unsuspected UR is common in patients admitted to a general rehabilitation unit. We recommend that all patients be screened for PVR on admission as an aid in bladder management.
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.012