Test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Version 4 (DISC-IV)

Background:  Despite the huge youth population, there is a lack of psychiatric diagnostic instruments with reported psychometric properties in Chinese. This study reports the development of the Chinese version of DISC‐IV and examines its test–retest reliability. Method:  Seventy‐eight parents and 79...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 2005-10, Vol.46 (10), p.1135-1138
Hauptverfasser: Ho, Ting-pong, Leung, Patrick Wing-leung, Lee, Chi-chiu, Tang, Chun-pan, Hung, Se-fong, Kwong, Shi-leung, Lucas, Christopher P., Lieh-Mak, Felice, Shaffer, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:  Despite the huge youth population, there is a lack of psychiatric diagnostic instruments with reported psychometric properties in Chinese. This study reports the development of the Chinese version of DISC‐IV and examines its test–retest reliability. Method:  Seventy‐eight parents and 79 youths (mean age 13.1 years) attending child psychiatric clinics were interviewed twice using the Chinese DISC‐IV (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children‐IV) about 22 days apart. Results:  The kappa coefficients were good to excellent for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) (both youth (Y) and parent (P) versions), major depressive disorder (MDD) (P), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (P); fair for anxiety disorder (P), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) (P, Y), MDD (Y); but poor for anxiety disorder (Y) and ADHD (Y). Parent informants had better test–retest reliability than youth informants. Conclusions:  The Chinese DISC‐IV had comparable test–retest reliability with the original English version.
ISSN:0021-9630
1469-7610
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01435.x