A comparison of training methods to increase neck muscle strength
Objective: To compare two neck strength training modalities. Background: Neck injury in pilots flying high performance aircraft is a concern in aviation medicine. Strength training may be an effective means to strengthen the neck and decrease injury risk. Methods: The cohort consisted of 32 age-heig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2005, Vol.25 (3), p.205-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To compare two neck strength training modalities.
Background: Neck injury in pilots flying high performance
aircraft is a concern in aviation medicine. Strength training may be an
effective means to strengthen the neck and decrease injury risk.
Methods: The cohort consisted of 32 age-height-weight matched
participants, divided into two experimental groups; the Multi-Cervical Unit
(MCU) and Thera-Band tubing groups (THER), and a control (CTRL) group. Ten
weeks of training were undertaken and pre-and post isometric strength testing
for all groups was performed on the MCU. Comparisons between the three groups
were made using a Kruskal-Wallis test and effect sizes between the MCU and the
THER groups and the THER and CTRL groups were also calculated.
Results: The MCU group displayed the greatest increase in
isometric strength (flexion 64.4%, extension 62.9%, left lateral flexion
53.3%, right lateral flexion 49.1%) and differences were only statistically
significant (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1051-9815 1875-9270 |
DOI: | 10.3233/WOR-2005-00456 |