Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness Without Performing Exercise Testing

Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with increased risk of chronic diseases and mortality; however, CRF assessment is usually not performed in many healthcare settings. The purpose of this study is to extend previous work on a non–exercise test model to predict CRF from health indicato...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2005-10, Vol.29 (3), p.185-193
Hauptverfasser: Jurca, Radim, Jackson, Andrew S., LaMonte, Michael J., Morrow, James R., Blair, Steven N., Wareham, Nicholas J., Haskell, William L., van Mechelen, Willem, Church, Timothy S., Jakicic, John M., Laukkanen, Raija
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with increased risk of chronic diseases and mortality; however, CRF assessment is usually not performed in many healthcare settings. The purpose of this study is to extend previous work on a non–exercise test model to predict CRF from health indicators that are easily obtained. Participants were men and women aged 20 to 70 years whose CRF level was quantified with a maximal or submaximal exercise test as part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Johnson Space Center (NASA, n=1863), Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study (ACLS, n=46,190), or Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey (ADNFS, n=1706). Other variables included gender, age, body mass index, resting heart rate, and self-reported physical activity levels. All variables used in the multiple linear regression models were independently related to the CRF in each of the study cohorts. The multiple correlation coefficients obtained within NASA, ACLS, and ADNFS participants, respectively, were 0.81, 0.77, and 0.76. The standard error of estimate (SEE) was 1.45, 1.50, and 1.97 metabolic equivalents (METs) (1 MET=3.5 ml O 2 uptake · kilograms of body mass −1 · minutes −1), respectively, for the NASA, ACLS, and ADNFS regression models. All regression models demonstrated a high level of cross-validity (0.72
ISSN:0749-3797
1873-2607
DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.004