Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone‐Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Basiliximab Induction—Long‐Term Results

This study examined alemtuzumab (anti‐CD 52, Campath‐1H) and basiliximab (anti‐CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single‐center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2005-10, Vol.5 (10), p.2539-2548
Hauptverfasser: Kaufman, Dixon B., Leventhal, Joseph R., Axelrod, David, Gallon, Lorenzo G., Parker, Michele A., Stuart, Frank P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examined alemtuzumab (anti‐CD 52, Campath‐1H) and basiliximab (anti‐CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single‐center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone‐free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan–Meier analyses of long‐term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long‐term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (
ISSN:1600-6135
1600-6143
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01067.x