Surveillance for Barrettʼs oesophagus: results from a programme in Northern Ireland

BACKGROUNDThe reported incidence of adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrettʼs oesophagus in surveillance programmes varies widely. Great Britain has one of the highest incidence rates of this cancer in the world, but there are no data from Ireland reporting its incidence in patients with Barrettʼs o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2005-10, Vol.17 (10), p.1029-1035
Hauptverfasser: Murphy, Seamus J, Dickey, William, Hughes, Dermot, OʼConnor, Frank A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDThe reported incidence of adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrettʼs oesophagus in surveillance programmes varies widely. Great Britain has one of the highest incidence rates of this cancer in the world, but there are no data from Ireland reporting its incidence in patients with Barrettʼs oesophagus undergoing surveillance. We carried out a study of all such patients at a large District General Hospital in Northern Ireland. METHODSA retrospective review of all patients with Barrettʼs oesophagus from January 1986 to March 2004 at Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Derry, Northern Ireland was performed. Barrettʼs oesophagus was defined as specialized intestinal metaplasia present in the tubular oesophagus. RESULTSA total of 277 patients had Barrettʼs oesophagus. Twenty-one patients had adenocarcinoma and two patients had high-grade dysplasia at initial endoscopy and were excluded. Of the remaining 254 patients, 178 were entered into the surveillance programme (127 men, 51 women). The average follow-up period was 3.4 years, resulting in 613 patient-years of follow-up. Three patients developed adenocarcinoma, an incidence of 1/204 patient-years of follow-up. Two of the three patients had early-stage (T1 or T2) cancers detected and are alive and well. A total of 429 surveillance endoscopies were performed, and a marked year-on-year increase in the workload generated as a result of the surveillance programme was observed. CONCLUSIONSThe incidence of adenocarcinoma in patients in Northern Ireland was similar to the incidence reported by other large institutions. Clinical benefit is suggested but is not certain from these data, because of biases that affect surveillance programmes. Large multicentre studies are required to determine whether surveillance is beneficial.
ISSN:0954-691X
1473-5687
DOI:10.1097/00042737-200510000-00005