Comparison of different methods of CAIX quantification in relation to hypoxia in three human head and neck tumor lines
In head and neck cancer, it has been shown that hypoxic tumors respond poorly to therapy. Methods to identify hypoxic tumors are, therefore, of importance to select patients for oxygenation modifying or other intensified treatments. The aim of this study was to compare tumor cell hypoxia assessed by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2005-08, Vol.76 (2), p.194-199 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In head and neck cancer, it has been shown that hypoxic tumors respond poorly to therapy. Methods to identify hypoxic tumors are, therefore, of importance to select patients for oxygenation modifying or other intensified treatments. The aim of this study was to compare tumor cell hypoxia assessed by the hypoxic cell marker pimonidazole (PIMO) with expression of the endogenous hypoxia-related marker carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) in three human head and neck tumor lines.
Forty-five tumors of three human head and neck tumor lines, SCCNij3, SCCNij59 and MEC82, xenografted in athymic mice, were used. CAIX was quantified by biodistribution (% injected dose/g tumor) after injecting 3–5
μl
111In-labeled G250 mouse antibody 3 days prior to euthanizing. In a tissue section from the same tumor, fractions of tumor area positive for PIMO, CAIX and Hoechst 33342 (perfusion marker) were assessed after immunohistochemical staining, using a digital image analysis system.
SCCNij3 and MEC82 were relatively hypoxic tumor lines with fractions of tumor area positive for pimonidazole of 0.16 and 0.15, respectively. SCCNij59 was a better-oxygenated tumor line with a PIMO-fraction of 0.03. The three tumor lines showed different levels and patterns of CAIX immunohistochemical staining, but only in MEC82 there was a good correlation between PIMO-fraction and CAIX-fraction (
r
2=0.92,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.031 |