Evaluation of apical surface roughness after root resection: a scanning electron microscopic study

Objectives The objective of this study was to compare, by scanning electron microscopy, the smoothness of the resected apical root surface after preparation with high-speed #699 bur, #699 bur plus Shofu finishing and Zekrya bur, and with an erbium:YAG laser. Study design Thirty-nine extracted human...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-12, Vol.104 (6), p.e74-e76
Hauptverfasser: Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro, PhD, Domingues, Rubens, MS, Matsumoto, Marisa Akemi, PhD, Padovan, Luis Eduardo Marques, PhD, Kuga, Milton Carlos, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The objective of this study was to compare, by scanning electron microscopy, the smoothness of the resected apical root surface after preparation with high-speed #699 bur, #699 bur plus Shofu finishing and Zekrya bur, and with an erbium:YAG laser. Study design Thirty-nine extracted human premolars were instrumented and obturated and their root apices were resected. The roots were divided into 4 groups according to the root resection method. The teeth were dried, metallized, and analyzed at ×400 by scanning electron microscopy. Scores ranging from 0 to 3 were attributed to surface smoothness. The data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test for overall comparison, and by Dunn’s test for individual comparisons. Results Smoother surfaces were observed for the groups treated with the #699 bur and the #699 bur plus Shofu point finishing, while rougher surfaces were obtained with the laser, which differed significantly from the other 2 methods ( P < .05). Conclusions Treatment with the #699 bur plus Shofu finishing yielded better results in terms of surface smoothness, whereas the laser treatment produced more irregular and rougher surfaces after root resection.
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.012