Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: Endosonographic differentiation in relation to histological risk

Background and Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the endosonographic characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach according to histological risk classification. Methods:  Twenty‐four cases of histologically proven c‐kit positive GISTs were divided into three g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2007-12, Vol.22 (12), p.2069-2075
Hauptverfasser: Jeon, Seong Woo, Park, Young Dae, Chung, Yun Jin, Cho, Chang Min, Tak, Won Young, Kweon, Young Oh, Kim, Sung Kook, Choi, Yong Hwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the endosonographic characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach according to histological risk classification. Methods:  Twenty‐four cases of histologically proven c‐kit positive GISTs were divided into three groups according to histological risk: low risk (n = 14), intermediate risk (n = 7) and high risk (n = 3). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features recorded were: size, ulceration, regularity of marginal border, lobulation, shape of tumor, marginal halo, homogeneity, internal echogenic or cystic foci, and the presence of exophytic development. Results:  Significant differences were seen in size between the groups studied (P = 0.026). All tumors in the high risk group had mucosal ulceration, which was more commonly seen in the intermediate risk group compared to the low risk group (P = 0.014). All tumors in the high risk group had irregular borders, but only three cases out of 11 in the low risk group had irregular borders (P = 0.039). Thirteen cases in the low risk group and five cases in the intermediate risk group had an oval or round shape; however, only one case in the high risk group showed this (P = 0.043). The optimal size value for prediction of the intermediate and high risk group was 30 mm. Sensitivity and specificity with this value was 80% and 79%, respectively. Conclusions:  Large, especially larger than 30 mm, GISTs of the stomach with irregular borders, mucosal ulceration and a non‐oval shape on EUS suggest higher risk GISTs of the stomach. These criteria might aid in the clinical management of GISTs of the stomach.
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04767.x