Congenital coronary anomalies in adults: Comparison of anatomic course visualization by catheter angiography and electron beam CT

The objective of this study was to compare the anatomic course of anomalous coronary arteries by axial and three‐dimensional volume‐rendered electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) angiography and X‐ray catheter angiography (CAG). We performed a blinded study where patients who previously underwent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2005-09, Vol.66 (1), p.34-42
Hauptverfasser: Memisoglu, Esat, Hobikoglu, Gultekin, Tepe, M. Savas, Norgaz, Tugrul, Bilsel, Tuba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this study was to compare the anatomic course of anomalous coronary arteries by axial and three‐dimensional volume‐rendered electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) angiography and X‐ray catheter angiography (CAG). We performed a blinded study where patients who previously underwent CAG with (n = 14) and without (n = 14; age‐ and gender‐matched controls) anomalous coronary anatomy were studied with EBCT coronary angiography. Forty to 50 EKG‐triggered 3 mm overlapping axial slices were acquired with 2 mm table movement within one breath hold during the i.v. injection of 140 cc of nonionic iodinated contrast (4 ml/sec). The axial source images and volume‐rendered three‐dimensional reconstructions were evaluated for the presence, type, and course of coronary anomalies and the results were compared to those of CAG. All normal and anomalous coronary arteries were identified by both modalities in all subjects. Identified anomalies include single coronary artery (n = 3), left‐sided right coronary artery (n = 3), right‐sided left main coronary artery (n = 3), anterior descending coronary artery (n = 2), circumflex coronary artery (n = 2), and separate left‐sided ostia for left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries (n = 1). In five cases, there was discrepancy in the course of the anomalous vessels between the two modalities. Consensus reading among cardiologist and radiologists favored the interpretation of EBCT over catheter angiography. Noninvasive EBCT coronary angiography compares well with CAG in identifying anomalous coronary arteries and may provide confirmatory evaluation of their precise anatomic relationships to the heart and great vessels. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.20444