Multiinstitutional European validation of the 2002 TNM staging system in conventional and papillary localized renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND The current study validated the 2002 edition of the TNM staging system in a multicenter, multinational European series of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS The authors analyzed the clinical data of 2217 patients who had undergone radical or partial nephrectomy for localized RC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2005-09, Vol.104 (5), p.968-974
Hauptverfasser: Ficarra, Vincenzo, Schips, Luigi, Guillè, François, Li, Guorong, De La Taille, Alexandre, Prayer Galetti, Tommaso, Cindolo, Luca, Novara, Giacomo, Zigeuner, Richard E., Bratti, Emiliano, Tostain, Jacques, Altieri, Vincenzo, Abbou, Claude C., Artibani, Walter, Patard, Jean‐Jacques
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND The current study validated the 2002 edition of the TNM staging system in a multicenter, multinational European series of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS The authors analyzed the clinical data of 2217 patients who had undergone radical or partial nephrectomy for localized RCC in 7 urologic centers. RESULTS In the current study, 1065 patients (48%) were classified as having pT1a disease, 771 (34.8%) were classified as having pT1b disease, and 381 (17.2%) were classified as having pT2 disease. Tumor histotype was conventional RCC in 1886 patients (85%), papillary in 182 (8.2%) patients, chromophobe in 64 (2.9%) patients, and unclassified in 85 (3.8%) patients. The mean follow‐up time was 65.36 ± 52.09 months. The 5 and 10‐year disease‐specific survival probabilities were 95.3% and 91.4% in patients with pT1a disease, 91.4% and 83.4% in patients with pT1b disease, and 81.6% and 75.2% in patients with pT2 disease (log‐rank test P value = 0.0000). The disease‐specific survival rates of patients with pT1a RCC were significantly higher than those recorded in patients with pT1b and pT2 RCC. Similarly, the disease‐specific survival probabilities of patients with pT1b RCCwere significantly better than those of patients with pT2 RCC. Analyzing the seven series individually, the 2002 TNM staging system provided appropriate stratification for only one series. The 2002 TNM staging system allowed significant stratification of the cancer‐related outcomes in the subgroup of patients with conventional RCC but not in those with papillary carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS The application of the 2002 TNM staging system in the current multicenter series enabled the authors to demonstrate optimal stratification of patients with localized RCC. Stratifying by tumor histotype, the data coming from the whole group analysis were reconfirmed for clear cell RCC only. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society. The application of the 2002 TNM staging system in a multicenter series of 2217 patients from 7 European academic institutions enabled the authors to demonstrate optimal stratification of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with regard to disease‐specific survival probabilities. Stratifying by tumor histotype, the data coming from the whole group analysis were reconfirmed for clear cell RCC only. The subclassification of localized RCCs into three subgroups made the outcome stratification of patients within single‐center series troublesome, probably b
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.21254