TELEMAM: A cluster randomised trial to assess the use of telemedicine in multi-disciplinary breast cancer decision making

Abstract Aim The TELEMAM trial aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and costs of telemedicine in conducting breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings (MDTs). Methods Over 12 months 473 MDT patient discussions in two district general hospitals (DGHs) were cluster randomised (2:1) to the interve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2007-11, Vol.43 (17), p.2506-2514
Hauptverfasser: Kunkler, I.H, Prescott, R.J, Lee, R.J, Brebner, J.A, Cairns, J.A, Fielding, R.G, Bowman, A, Neades, G, Walls, A.D.F, Chetty, U, Dixon, J.M, Smith, M.E, Gardner, T.W, Macnab, M, Swann, S, Maclean, J.R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aim The TELEMAM trial aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and costs of telemedicine in conducting breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings (MDTs). Methods Over 12 months 473 MDT patient discussions in two district general hospitals (DGHs) were cluster randomised (2:1) to the intervention of telemedicine linkage to breast specialists in a cancer centre or to the control group of ‘in-person’ meetings. Primary endpoints were clinical effectiveness and costs. Economic analysis was based on a cost-minimisation approach. Results Levels of agreement of MDT members on a scale from 1 to 5 were high and similar in both the telemedicine and standard meetings for decision sharing (4.04 versus 4.17), consensus (4.06 versus 4.20) and confidence in the decision (4.16 versus 4.07). The threshold at which the telemedicine meetings became cheaper than standard MDTs was approximately 40 meetings per year. Conclusion Telemedicine delivered breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings have similar clinical effectiveness to standard ‘in-person’ meetings.
ISSN:0959-8049
1879-0852
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.026