An analysis of cost and clinical outcome in palliation for advanced pancreatic cancer

The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2005-09, Vol.190 (3), p.406-411
Hauptverfasser: Mortenson, Melinda M., Ho, Hung S., Bold, Richard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included the initial surgical procedure and any additional procedure required to achieve satisfactory palliation. Of 96 patients (1993–2002), 6% had biliary bypass, 42% had duodenal bypass, 40% had double bypass, and 13% had no procedure with equivalent clinical outcomes. If biliary bypass was not initially performed, there was a significant incidence of biliary complications before definitive endoscopic stenting ( P = .01). If duodenal bypass was not initially performed, 11% developed duodenal obstruction ( P = .04). Total RVUs was highest for a double bypass and lowest for no initial surgical palliative procedure. Although surgical bypass procedures at initial exploration provide durable palliation, these procedures are associated with greater costs.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.014