An analysis of cost and clinical outcome in palliation for advanced pancreatic cancer
The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2005-09, Vol.190 (3), p.406-411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial.
A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included the initial surgical procedure and any additional procedure required to achieve satisfactory palliation.
Of 96 patients (1993–2002), 6% had biliary bypass, 42% had duodenal bypass, 40% had double bypass, and 13% had no procedure with equivalent clinical outcomes. If biliary bypass was not initially performed, there was a significant incidence of biliary complications before definitive endoscopic stenting (
P = .01). If duodenal bypass was not initially performed, 11% developed duodenal obstruction (
P = .04). Total RVUs was highest for a double bypass and lowest for no initial surgical palliative procedure.
Although surgical bypass procedures at initial exploration provide durable palliation, these procedures are associated with greater costs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.014 |