Individualized population pharmacokinetic model with limited sampling for cyclosporine monitoring after liver transplantation in clinical practice

Summary Background  We recently developed and validated limited sampling models (LSMs) for cyclosporine monitoring after orthotopic liver transplantation based on individualized population pharmacokinetic models with Bayesian modelling. Aim  To evaluate LSM in practice, and to seek optimal balance b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2007-11, Vol.26 (10), p.1447-1454
Hauptverfasser: LANGERS, P., CREMERS, S. C. L. M., DEN HARTIGH, J., RIJNBEEK, E. M. T., RINGERS, J., LAMERS, C. B. H. W., HOMMES, D. W., VAN HOEK, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background  We recently developed and validated limited sampling models (LSMs) for cyclosporine monitoring after orthotopic liver transplantation based on individualized population pharmacokinetic models with Bayesian modelling. Aim  To evaluate LSM in practice, and to seek optimal balance between benefit and discomfort. Methods  In 30 stable patients, more than 6 months after orthotopic liver transplantation, previously switched from trough‐ to 2 h post‐dose (C2)‐monitoring, we switched to 3‐monthly LSM 0,1,2,3 h‐monitoring. During 18 months we evaluated dose, creatinine clearance, calculated area under the curve, intra‐patient pharmacokinetic variability and ability to assess systemic exposure by several previously validated LSMs. Results  Within patients, there was variability of cyclosporine‐area under the curve with the same dose (CV of 15%). Compared to C2‐monitoring, there was no significant difference in dose (P = 0.237), creatinine clearance (P = 0.071) and number of rejections. Some models showed excellent correlation and precision with LSM 0,1,2,3 h comparing area under the curves (0,2 h: r2 = 0.88; 0,1,3 h: r2 = 0.91; 0,2,3 h: r2 = 0.92, all P 
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03514.x