A Randomized Trial of Depression Assessment Intervention in Home Health Care
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an educational intervention would improve depression assessment and appropriate referral. Secondary analyses tested whether referral led to depression improvement. DESIGN: Training in the Assessment of Depression (TRIAD) was a three‐group, nurse‐randomized trial. Res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2007-11, Vol.55 (11), p.1793-1800 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an educational intervention would improve depression assessment and appropriate referral. Secondary analyses tested whether referral led to depression improvement.
DESIGN: Training in the Assessment of Depression (TRIAD) was a three‐group, nurse‐randomized trial. Researchers interviewed randomly selected patients at baseline and 8 weeks.
SETTING: Three certified home healthcare agencies in Westchester County, New York.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty‐three medical/surgical nurses were randomized within agency to three intervention groups: full, minimal, or control. Research contact with nurses' patients (aged >65; N=477) yielded 256 (53.7%) enrolled subjects, 84 (17.6%) ineligibles, and 120 (25.2%) refusals; 233 of the 256 (87.1%) enrolled patients completed follow‐up interviews.
INTERVENTION: Nurse training in clinically meaningful use of depression sections of Medicare's mandatory Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS).
MEASUREMENTS: Nurse‐assessed mood or anhedonia (OASIS) versus research assessments using the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Disorders (SCID); referrals for mental health evaluation (agency records), and depression severity (24‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HDRS).
RESULTS: Referral rates for patients with (SCID) depressed mood or anhedonia (n=75) varied according to nurse group: 50.0% full intervention, 18.5% minimal, 21.4% control (P=.047). Rates for nondepressed patients (n=180) did not differ (4.9%, 2.0%, 5.8%, respectively; P=.60). In patients with major or minor depression (n=37), referral was associated with symptom improvement. Change in HDRS was 5 points greater in referred patients than others (P=.04). Concordance between OASIS and SCID did not differ between intervention groups.
CONCLUSION: TRIAD showed that training nurses to assess for depression using an approach developed in partnership with home healthcare agencies led to appropriate referral and care for depressed patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01419.x |