Response of T Lymphocyte Populations in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: Influence of Neoajuvant Total Androgen Suppression

Background: This study sought to better define the immunological impact of combining neoadjuvant total androgen suppression (TAS) with radiotherapy (xRT) in treating prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Subjects selected (n=37) were stage I-II prostate cancer patients meeting the eligibility requ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anticancer research 2005-07, Vol.25 (4), p.3159-3166
Hauptverfasser: JOHNKE, Roberta M, EDWARDS, Judy M, O'BRIEN, Kevin F, KOVACS, Charles J, EVANS, Mark J, DALY, Barbara M, KARLSSON, Ulf L, LEE, Tung-Kwang, ALLISON, Ron R, ARASTU, Hyder H, CARIVEAU, Mickael J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: This study sought to better define the immunological impact of combining neoadjuvant total androgen suppression (TAS) with radiotherapy (xRT) in treating prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Subjects selected (n=37) were stage I-II prostate cancer patients meeting the eligibility requirements for RTOG protocols 94-08 or 94-13. Flow cytometric monitoring of circulating T helper (T h ), T suppressor/cytotoxic (T s ), natural killer (NK) and B lymphocytes was performed weekly. Results: Significant reduction of all lymphocyte subsets occurred as a result of xRT. Comparison between treatment groups demonstrated that the B lymphocyte and NK lymphocyte radioresponse was not influenced by TAS, but the T h and T s lymphocyte response was, with addition of TAS leading to less radiation-induced decline. Conclusion: The basis for this T cell response is unclear, but may involve a TAS-induced reduction of testosterone's immunomodulation of T cell proliferation and apoptosis and/or a direct, TAS-induced thymic stimulation. Our data suggest that addition of TAS to xRT appears to have no detrimental effects on lymphocyte subsets, and, indeed, may have favorable effects on T cells.
ISSN:0250-7005
1791-7530