Role for DNA polymerase beta in response to ionizing radiation

Evidence for a role of DNA polymerase β in determining radiosensitivity is conflicting. In vitro assays show an involvement of DNA polymerase β in single strand break repair and base excision repair of oxidative damages, both products of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless the lack of DNA polymerase β...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:DNA repair 2007-02, Vol.6 (2), p.202-212
Hauptverfasser: Vermeulen, Christie, Verwijs-Janssen, Manon, Cramers, Patricia, Begg, Adrian C., Vens, Conchita
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Evidence for a role of DNA polymerase β in determining radiosensitivity is conflicting. In vitro assays show an involvement of DNA polymerase β in single strand break repair and base excision repair of oxidative damages, both products of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless the lack of DNA polymerase β has been shown to have no effect on radiosensitivity. Here we show that mouse embryonic fibroblasts deficient in DNA polymerase β are considerably more sensitive to ionizing radiation than wild-type cells, but only when confluent. The inhibitor methoxyamine renders abasic sites refractory to the dRP lyase activity of DNA polymerase β. Methoxyamine did not significantly change radiosensitivity of wild-type fibroblasts in log phase. However, DNA polymerase β deficient cells in log phase were radiosensitized by methoxyamine. Alkaline comet assays confirmed repair inhibition of ionizing radiation induced damage by methoxyamine in these cells, indicating both the existence of a polymerase β-dependent long patch pathway and the involvement of another methoxyamine sensitive process, implying the participation of a second short patch polymerase(s) other than DNA polymerase β. This is the first evidence of a role for DNA polymerase β in radiosensitivity in vivo.
ISSN:1568-7864
1568-7856
DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.09.011