Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: A prospective randomized trial

Abstract Study objective To compare long-term histologic features of endometrial rollerball ablation versus resection. Design Randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting Akdeniz University School of Medicine. Patients Women with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial ablati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2007, Vol.14 (1), p.39-42
Hauptverfasser: Onoglu, Ahmet, MD, Taskin, Omur, MD, Inal, Murat, MD, Sadik, Salih, MD, Simsek, Mehmet, MD, Akar, Munire, MD, Kursun, Sinan, MD, Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD, Postaci, Hakan, MD, Ispahi, Cigdem, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
container_volume 14
creator Onoglu, Ahmet, MD
Taskin, Omur, MD
Inal, Murat, MD
Sadik, Salih, MD
Simsek, Mehmet, MD
Akar, Munire, MD
Kursun, Sinan, MD
Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD
Postaci, Hakan, MD
Ispahi, Cigdem, MD
description Abstract Study objective To compare long-term histologic features of endometrial rollerball ablation versus resection. Design Randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting Akdeniz University School of Medicine. Patients Women with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial ablation. Intervention Comparison of patients with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial resection and ablation. Measurements and main results Endometrial rollerball ablation (n = 23 women) and resection (n = 25) were followed by second-look office hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy. Mean follow-up to second look hysteroscopy after rollerball ablation and loop resection was 33.4 ± 2.1 and 31.1 ± 2.6 months, respectively. Complete atrophy and partial adhesion or obliteration of the cavity and fibrosis were observed at second-look hysteroscopy and were similar in both groups. Whereas all random biopsy specimens after both ablation and resection revealed diminished endometrial glands with varied necrosis and scarring, the number of endometrial glands per field was not correlated with amount of bleeding or menstrual pattern. Bleeding patterns were similar between the groups. No precancerous or malignant lesion was found after the procedures. Conclusion Although efficacy of both endometrial ablation and resection is related to initial thermal destruction and correlated with postablation hysteroscopic and histologic findings, endometrial regrowth may be expected and is not a failure of ablation. Both procedures revealed histopathologically and clinically similar results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68417270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1553465006003438</els_id><sourcerecordid>68417270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c3806d48b2adce422783e6d1032731de0d177e06e882b3208eb7c50b15b351ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQDaK46-gf8CA5eesxH91JVkRYBr9gwcOu55BOambSpjtt0rOw-0f8uybO6IIHoSApeO_x6lUh9JKSNSVUvBnWw-h3a0aIWNdi8hE6p13Hm1aIi8d__x05Q89yHgjhsmCfojMqGVWMyXP0cxPH2SSf44TjFi97wCFOu2aBNOK9z0uczbKPIe68xWZyeIxp_tPbvZl2kLHZFjiGycURluRNwCmGAKk3IWDTB7P4Il_ZCTLY2r3Fl3hOMc-1vQWcTGX7e3D4t8Jz9GRrQoYXp3eFvn38cLP53Fx9_fRlc3nV2JZcLI3ligjXqp4ZZ6EtIykOwlHCmeTUAXFUSiAClGI9Z0RBL21Hetr1vKPW8BV6fdQtZn4cIC969NlCCGaCeMhaqLaEJUkBsiPQFtc5wVbPyY8m3WlKdF2HHnRdh67r0LWKgxV6dVI_9CO4B8op_wJ4dwRAmfHWQ9LZepgsOJ9KMtpF_3_99__QbfCTtyZ8hzvIQzykqaSnqc5ME31dD6LeAxHlFlqu-C_6orQz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68417270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: A prospective randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD ; Taskin, Omur, MD ; Inal, Murat, MD ; Sadik, Salih, MD ; Simsek, Mehmet, MD ; Akar, Munire, MD ; Kursun, Sinan, MD ; Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD ; Postaci, Hakan, MD ; Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD ; Taskin, Omur, MD ; Inal, Murat, MD ; Sadik, Salih, MD ; Simsek, Mehmet, MD ; Akar, Munire, MD ; Kursun, Sinan, MD ; Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD ; Postaci, Hakan, MD ; Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study objective To compare long-term histologic features of endometrial rollerball ablation versus resection. Design Randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting Akdeniz University School of Medicine. Patients Women with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial ablation. Intervention Comparison of patients with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial resection and ablation. Measurements and main results Endometrial rollerball ablation (n = 23 women) and resection (n = 25) were followed by second-look office hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy. Mean follow-up to second look hysteroscopy after rollerball ablation and loop resection was 33.4 ± 2.1 and 31.1 ± 2.6 months, respectively. Complete atrophy and partial adhesion or obliteration of the cavity and fibrosis were observed at second-look hysteroscopy and were similar in both groups. Whereas all random biopsy specimens after both ablation and resection revealed diminished endometrial glands with varied necrosis and scarring, the number of endometrial glands per field was not correlated with amount of bleeding or menstrual pattern. Bleeding patterns were similar between the groups. No precancerous or malignant lesion was found after the procedures. Conclusion Although efficacy of both endometrial ablation and resection is related to initial thermal destruction and correlated with postablation hysteroscopic and histologic findings, endometrial regrowth may be expected and is not a failure of ablation. Both procedures revealed histopathologically and clinically similar results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-4669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17218227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Electrocoagulation ; Endometrial resection ; Endometrium - pathology ; Endometrium - surgery ; Female ; Histopathology ; Humans ; Hysteroscopy ; Hysteroscopy - methods ; Menorrhagia - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Office hysteroscopy ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Rollerball ablation ; Second-Look Surgery ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2007, Vol.14 (1), p.39-42</ispartof><rights>AAGL</rights><rights>2007 AAGL</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c3806d48b2adce422783e6d1032731de0d177e06e882b3208eb7c50b15b351ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c3806d48b2adce422783e6d1032731de0d177e06e882b3208eb7c50b15b351ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taskin, Omur, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inal, Murat, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadik, Salih, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Mehmet, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akar, Munire, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kursun, Sinan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postaci, Hakan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: A prospective randomized trial</title><title>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</title><addtitle>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</addtitle><description>Abstract Study objective To compare long-term histologic features of endometrial rollerball ablation versus resection. Design Randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting Akdeniz University School of Medicine. Patients Women with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial ablation. Intervention Comparison of patients with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial resection and ablation. Measurements and main results Endometrial rollerball ablation (n = 23 women) and resection (n = 25) were followed by second-look office hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy. Mean follow-up to second look hysteroscopy after rollerball ablation and loop resection was 33.4 ± 2.1 and 31.1 ± 2.6 months, respectively. Complete atrophy and partial adhesion or obliteration of the cavity and fibrosis were observed at second-look hysteroscopy and were similar in both groups. Whereas all random biopsy specimens after both ablation and resection revealed diminished endometrial glands with varied necrosis and scarring, the number of endometrial glands per field was not correlated with amount of bleeding or menstrual pattern. Bleeding patterns were similar between the groups. No precancerous or malignant lesion was found after the procedures. Conclusion Although efficacy of both endometrial ablation and resection is related to initial thermal destruction and correlated with postablation hysteroscopic and histologic findings, endometrial regrowth may be expected and is not a failure of ablation. Both procedures revealed histopathologically and clinically similar results.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Endometrial resection</subject><subject>Endometrium - pathology</subject><subject>Endometrium - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Menorrhagia - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Office hysteroscopy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Rollerball ablation</subject><subject>Second-Look Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1553-4650</issn><issn>1553-4669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQDaK46-gf8CA5eesxH91JVkRYBr9gwcOu55BOambSpjtt0rOw-0f8uybO6IIHoSApeO_x6lUh9JKSNSVUvBnWw-h3a0aIWNdi8hE6p13Hm1aIi8d__x05Q89yHgjhsmCfojMqGVWMyXP0cxPH2SSf44TjFi97wCFOu2aBNOK9z0uczbKPIe68xWZyeIxp_tPbvZl2kLHZFjiGycURluRNwCmGAKk3IWDTB7P4Il_ZCTLY2r3Fl3hOMc-1vQWcTGX7e3D4t8Jz9GRrQoYXp3eFvn38cLP53Fx9_fRlc3nV2JZcLI3ligjXqp4ZZ6EtIykOwlHCmeTUAXFUSiAClGI9Z0RBL21Hetr1vKPW8BV6fdQtZn4cIC969NlCCGaCeMhaqLaEJUkBsiPQFtc5wVbPyY8m3WlKdF2HHnRdh67r0LWKgxV6dVI_9CO4B8op_wJ4dwRAmfHWQ9LZepgsOJ9KMtpF_3_99__QbfCTtyZ8hzvIQzykqaSnqc5ME31dD6LeAxHlFlqu-C_6orQz</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD</creator><creator>Taskin, Omur, MD</creator><creator>Inal, Murat, MD</creator><creator>Sadik, Salih, MD</creator><creator>Simsek, Mehmet, MD</creator><creator>Akar, Munire, MD</creator><creator>Kursun, Sinan, MD</creator><creator>Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD</creator><creator>Postaci, Hakan, MD</creator><creator>Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: A prospective randomized trial</title><author>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD ; Taskin, Omur, MD ; Inal, Murat, MD ; Sadik, Salih, MD ; Simsek, Mehmet, MD ; Akar, Munire, MD ; Kursun, Sinan, MD ; Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD ; Postaci, Hakan, MD ; Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c3806d48b2adce422783e6d1032731de0d177e06e882b3208eb7c50b15b351ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Endometrial resection</topic><topic>Endometrium - pathology</topic><topic>Endometrium - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Menorrhagia - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Office hysteroscopy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Rollerball ablation</topic><topic>Second-Look Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taskin, Omur, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inal, Murat, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadik, Salih, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Mehmet, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akar, Munire, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kursun, Sinan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postaci, Hakan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onoglu, Ahmet, MD</au><au>Taskin, Omur, MD</au><au>Inal, Murat, MD</au><au>Sadik, Salih, MD</au><au>Simsek, Mehmet, MD</au><au>Akar, Munire, MD</au><au>Kursun, Sinan, MD</au><au>Mendilcioglu, Inanc, MD</au><au>Postaci, Hakan, MD</au><au>Ispahi, Cigdem, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: A prospective randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>39-42</pages><issn>1553-4650</issn><eissn>1553-4669</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study objective To compare long-term histologic features of endometrial rollerball ablation versus resection. Design Randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting Akdeniz University School of Medicine. Patients Women with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial ablation. Intervention Comparison of patients with menorrhagia undergoing endometrial resection and ablation. Measurements and main results Endometrial rollerball ablation (n = 23 women) and resection (n = 25) were followed by second-look office hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy. Mean follow-up to second look hysteroscopy after rollerball ablation and loop resection was 33.4 ± 2.1 and 31.1 ± 2.6 months, respectively. Complete atrophy and partial adhesion or obliteration of the cavity and fibrosis were observed at second-look hysteroscopy and were similar in both groups. Whereas all random biopsy specimens after both ablation and resection revealed diminished endometrial glands with varied necrosis and scarring, the number of endometrial glands per field was not correlated with amount of bleeding or menstrual pattern. Bleeding patterns were similar between the groups. No precancerous or malignant lesion was found after the procedures. Conclusion Although efficacy of both endometrial ablation and resection is related to initial thermal destruction and correlated with postablation hysteroscopic and histologic findings, endometrial regrowth may be expected and is not a failure of ablation. Both procedures revealed histopathologically and clinically similar results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17218227</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.027</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-4650
ispartof Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2007, Vol.14 (1), p.39-42
issn 1553-4650
1553-4669
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68417270
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Electrocoagulation
Endometrial resection
Endometrium - pathology
Endometrium - surgery
Female
Histopathology
Humans
Hysteroscopy
Hysteroscopy - methods
Menorrhagia - surgery
Middle Aged
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Office hysteroscopy
Prospective Studies
Recurrence
Rollerball ablation
Second-Look Surgery
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: A prospective randomized trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20long-term%20histopathologic%20and%20morphologic%20changes%20after%20endometrial%20rollerball%20ablation%20and%20resection:%20A%20prospective%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20minimally%20invasive%20gynecology&rft.au=Onoglu,%20Ahmet,%20MD&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=39-42&rft.issn=1553-4650&rft.eissn=1553-4669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68417270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68417270&rft_id=info:pmid/17218227&rft_els_id=S1553465006003438&rfr_iscdi=true