Phacoemulsification vs Small-Incision Manual Cataract Surgery: An Expert Trial

In this issue, results from a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) are published in which two techniques for cataract extraction are compared.1 The question of whether manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery (SICS) is as effective and safe as phacoemulsification is addressed. W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2007, Vol.143 (1), p.143-144
1. Verfasser: Wormald, Richard P., MSc, FRCS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this issue, results from a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) are published in which two techniques for cataract extraction are compared.1 The question of whether manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery (SICS) is as effective and safe as phacoemulsification is addressed. When publication was sought for a British Medical Research Council (MRC) trial comparing phacoemulsification to extracapsular extraction, peer reviewers initially recommended rejection because they regarded the case already made that phacoemulsification was safer and more effective.
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.026