Artefact as the Pathologist’s Friend: Peritumoral Retraction in In Situ and Infiltrating Duct Carcinoma of the Breast

Peritumoral retraction artefact appears in tissue sections as an empty space partially or completely encircling a nest of tumor cells, usually in conformity with the rounded or angular outline of that particular nest. The present study was designed to test this finding in a large series of cases and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgical pathology 2007-01, Vol.15 (1), p.53-59
Hauptverfasser: Irie, Junji, Manucha, Varsha, Ioffe, Olga B., Silverberg, Steven G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Peritumoral retraction artefact appears in tissue sections as an empty space partially or completely encircling a nest of tumor cells, usually in conformity with the rounded or angular outline of that particular nest. The present study was designed to test this finding in a large series of cases and to quantify the appearance of peritumoral retraction artefact in, in situ and infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. We examined 199 cases of infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) and 188 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Of the total of 387 cases, 111 were core needle biopsies, whereas the others were larger resections. In each specimen, retraction was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides as negative, 1+ (1% to 25% of tumor showing retraction), 2+ (26% to 50%), 3+ (51% to 75%), or 4+ (76% to 100%). Overall, peritumoral retraction was noted in 168 of 199 cases (84.4%) of IDC, versus 30 of 188 cases (16%) of DCIS (P < 0.0001). Peritumoral retraction scored as 2+ or greater (26% to 50%) was seen in only 1 of 188 DCIS specimens, compared with 77 of 199 IDC. Thus, peritumoral retraction artefact appears to be a significant finding seen during the evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin specimens for the diagnosis of carcinoma. We discuss the possibility that this phenomenon might represent true prelymphatic space involvement rather than a fixation artefact.
ISSN:1066-8969
1940-2465
DOI:10.1177/1066896906295690