Does a “hub and spoke” maxillofacial trauma service affect management decisions?

Abstract Aim Using mandibular fractures (excluding those of the condyle) as a model, to find out how management is influenced by whether patients present at the “hub” or “spoke” of a maxillofacial trauma service. Materials Data on non-condylar mandibular fractures from a maxillofacial trauma databas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2007-01, Vol.45 (1), p.54-55
Hauptverfasser: Layton, S.A, Badlani, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aim Using mandibular fractures (excluding those of the condyle) as a model, to find out how management is influenced by whether patients present at the “hub” or “spoke” of a maxillofacial trauma service. Materials Data on non-condylar mandibular fractures from a maxillofacial trauma database over a 5-year period. Results Significantly more non-condylar mandibular fractures were treated conservatively in patients who presented at the peripheral spoke hospitals than in those who presented at the hub hospital, despite the populations being similar. Conclusion Geographical presentation of a patient with a non-condylar mandibular fracture in a hub and spoke maxillofacial trauma service influences management decisions.
ISSN:0266-4356
1532-1940
DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.011