Does a “hub and spoke” maxillofacial trauma service affect management decisions?
Abstract Aim Using mandibular fractures (excluding those of the condyle) as a model, to find out how management is influenced by whether patients present at the “hub” or “spoke” of a maxillofacial trauma service. Materials Data on non-condylar mandibular fractures from a maxillofacial trauma databas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2007-01, Vol.45 (1), p.54-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Aim Using mandibular fractures (excluding those of the condyle) as a model, to find out how management is influenced by whether patients present at the “hub” or “spoke” of a maxillofacial trauma service. Materials Data on non-condylar mandibular fractures from a maxillofacial trauma database over a 5-year period. Results Significantly more non-condylar mandibular fractures were treated conservatively in patients who presented at the peripheral spoke hospitals than in those who presented at the hub hospital, despite the populations being similar. Conclusion Geographical presentation of a patient with a non-condylar mandibular fracture in a hub and spoke maxillofacial trauma service influences management decisions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.011 |