Outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients without major risk factors and patients with at least one major risk factor for coronary artery disease

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become a safer procedure in recent years. We aimed to compare complications and early outcome of CABG in patients without history of general risk factors with those in patients with at least one general risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Cross-s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of medical sciences 2007-10, Vol.61 (10), p.547-554
Hauptverfasser: Nozari, Younes, Hashemlu, Ali, Hatmi, Zinat Nadia, Sheikhvatan, Mehrdad, Iravani, Amir, Bazdar, Ali, Babakhan, Nasir, Ghasri, Nazanin Gholami
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become a safer procedure in recent years. We aimed to compare complications and early outcome of CABG in patients without history of general risk factors with those in patients with at least one general risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Cross-sectional study. Postoperative in-hospital complications, 30-day mortality rate and length of stay in hospital of 708 patients without preoperative general risk factors undergoing CABG in three university hospitals were assessed and compared with 10,844 patients undergoing CABG with at least one general risk factor as controls. In addition, the association of the studied variables with patients' early outcome was evaluated. SPSS software with Pearson's chi2 test; independent sample t test, Mann-Whitney test and univariate analysis were used. All studied in-hospital complications were similar between the two groups. Thirty days mortality rate (0.7% in study group and 1.4% in control group) was similar between groups, whereas prolonged length of stay (>12 days) was more frequent in control group (61.33% vs. 71.36%, P
ISSN:0019-5359
1998-3654
DOI:10.4103/0019-5359.35804