Blood Markers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Background: Despite different available methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and their proven benefits, morbidity, and mortality of this malignancy are still high, partly due to low compliance with screening. Minimally invasive tests based on the analysis of blood specimens may overcome thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2007-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1935-1953 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Despite different available methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and their proven benefits, morbidity,
and mortality of this malignancy are still high, partly due to low compliance with screening. Minimally invasive tests based
on the analysis of blood specimens may overcome this problem. The purpose of this review was to give an overview of published
studies on blood markers aimed at the early detection of CRC and to summarize their performance characteristics.
Method: The PUBMED database was searched for relevant studies published until June 2006. Only studies with more than 20 cases
and more than 20 controls were included. Information on the markers under study, on the underlying study populations, and
on performance characteristics was extracted. Special attention was given to performance characteristics by tumor stage.
Results: Overall, 93 studies evaluating 70 different markers were included. Most studies were done on protein markers, but
DNA markers and RNA markers were also investigated. Performance characteristics varied widely between different markers, but
also between different studies using the same marker. Promising results were reported for some novel assays, e.g., assays
based on SELDI-TOF MS or MALDI-TOF MS, for some proteins (e.g., soluble CD26 and bone sialoprotein) and also for some genetic
assays (e.g., L6 mRNA), but evidence thus far is restricted to single studies with limited sample size and without further
external validation.
Conclusions: Larger prospective studies using study populations representing a screening population are needed to verify promising
results. In addition, future studies should pay increased attention to the potential of detecting precursor lesions. (Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(10):1935–53) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0994 |