Efficacy of Maintenance Treatment Approaches for Childhood Overweight: A Randomized Controlled Trial
CONTEXT No trials for childhood overweight have examined maintenance interventions to augment the effects of initial weight loss programs. OBJECTIVES To determine the short-term and long-term efficacy of 2 distinct weight maintenance approaches vs no continued treatment control following standard fa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2007-10, Vol.298 (14), p.1661-1673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT No trials for childhood overweight have examined maintenance interventions to augment the effects of initial weight loss programs. OBJECTIVES To determine the short-term and long-term efficacy of 2 distinct weight maintenance approaches vs no continued treatment control following standard family-based behavioral weight loss treatment for childhood overweight, and to examine children's social functioning as a moderator of outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial conducted between October 1999 and July 2004 in a university-based weight control clinic. Participants were 204 healthy 7- to 12-year-olds, 20% to 100% above median body mass index (BMI) for age and sex, with at least 1 overweight parent. Children enrolled in 5 months of weight loss treatment and 150 were randomized to 1 of 3 maintenance conditions. Follow-up assessments occurred immediately following maintenance treatments and 1 and 2 years following randomization. INTERVENTIONS Maintenance conditions included the control group or 4 months of behavioral skills maintenance (BSM) or social facilitation maintenance (SFM) treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES BMI z score and percentage overweight. RESULTS Children receiving either BSM or SFM maintained relative weight significantly better than children assigned to the control group from randomization to postweight maintenance (P≤.01 for all; effect sizes d = 0.72-0.96; mean changes in BMI z scores = −0.04, −0.04, −0.05, and 0.05 for BSM alone, SFM alone, BSM and SFM together, and the control group, respectively). Active maintenance treatment efficacy relative to the control group declined during follow-up, but the effects of SFM alone (P = .03; d = 0.45; mean change in BMI z score = −0.24) and when analyzed together with BSM (P = .04; d = 0.38; mean change in BMI z score = −0.22) were significantly better than the control group (mean change in BMI z score = −0.06) when examining BMI z score outcomes from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Baseline child social problem scores moderated child relative weight change from baseline to 2-year follow-up, with low social problem children in SFM vs the control group having the best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The addition of maintenance-targeted treatment improves short-term efficacy of weight loss treatment for children relative to no maintenance treatment. However, the waning of effects over follow-up, although moderated by child initial social problems, suggests the ne |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.298.14.1661 |