Standards for ethical publication

If ever an author has questions on the interpretation of redundant or duplication publication, it is his/her responsibility to bring the question to the attention of the editor-in-chief before the review or publication of the manuscript. When indicated, other actions may also be independently undert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	American journal of otolaryngology 2007, Vol.28 (1), p.1-2
Hauptverfasser:	Johnson, Jonas T., MD, Niparko, John K., MD, Levine, Paul A., MD, Kennedy, David W., MD, Rudy, Susan F., MSN, CRNP, CORLN, Weber, Pete, MD, Weber, Randal S., MD, Benninger, Michael S., MD, Rosenfeld, Richard M., MD, MPH, Ruben, Robert J., MD, Smith, Richard J.H., MD, Sataloff, Robert Thayer, MD, DMA, Weir, Neil, MA, FRCS
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Editorial Policies Editors Ethics Ethics, Research Journalism, Medical - standards Otolaryngology Peer Review, Research - ethics Peer Review, Research - standards Periodicals as Topic - ethics Periodicals as Topic - standards Publishing - ethics Publishing - standards Scientific Misconduct - ethics Surgery
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	If ever an author has questions on the interpretation of redundant or duplication publication, it is his/her responsibility to bring the question to the attention of the editor-in-chief before the review or publication of the manuscript. When indicated, other actions may also be independently undertaken by the respective editors, including, but not limited to, notification of the dean, department chair, or chair of the scientific integrity committee at the author's institution.
ISSN:	0196-0709 1532-818X
DOI:	10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.11.002