An assessment of the association of bispectral index with 2 clinical sedation scales for monitoring depth of procedural sedation

Abstract Objective We conducted a study to assess the correlation of bispectral index (BIS) to 2 clinical sedation scales. Methods This was a prospective, observational study. The BIS number was recorded at baseline and every 30 seconds. One investigator separately monitored the patients for depth o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2007-10, Vol.25 (8), p.918-924
Hauptverfasser: Weaver, Christopher S., MD, Hauter, William H., MD, Duncan, Cory E., MD, Brizendine, Edward J., MS, Cordell, William H., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective We conducted a study to assess the correlation of bispectral index (BIS) to 2 clinical sedation scales. Methods This was a prospective, observational study. The BIS number was recorded at baseline and every 30 seconds. One investigator separately monitored the patients for depth of sedation using the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation and the Continuum of Depth of Sedation scales. Results During the 6-month period, 75 patients were enrolled. The Spearman correlation between the BIS and the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.74). The Spearman correlation between the BIS and the Continuum of Depth of Sedation was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.36-0.70). The mean minimum BIS for patients without a complication was 70 (SD, 15.9) compared with 68 (SD, 12.9) for patients with a complication (difference = 2; 95% CI, −7-11). Conclusions Our study demonstrated moderate correlation between BIS and the 2 clinical sedation scales. The correlation is not strong enough to be used reliably in a clinical setting. The mean minimum BIS scores were not significantly different for those with sedation complications vs those without complications.
ISSN:0735-6757
1532-8171
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.02.042