Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments

Background Basic telesurgical manoeuvres were conducted with signal delays. Methods Eight test subjects conducted four manoeuvres. Time delays of 0–1000 ms were investigated. Time to task completion and error rate were recorded in sequential delays of 0–600 ms. Additionally, blinded random delays of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery 2006-09, Vol.2 (3), p.216-224
Hauptverfasser: Rayman, R., Croome, K., Galbraith, N., McClure, R., Morady, R., Peterson, S., Smith, S., Subotic, V., Van Wynsberghe, A., Primak, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Basic telesurgical manoeuvres were conducted with signal delays. Methods Eight test subjects conducted four manoeuvres. Time delays of 0–1000 ms were investigated. Time to task completion and error rate were recorded in sequential delays of 0–600 ms. Additionally, blinded random delays of 0–1000 ms were studied. Results In the sequential trials (0–600 ms), there were no significant differences in average task time compared to zero latency. The error rate remained low despite increasing time delay, and was significantly less at 500 ms (p < 0.05). In the random trials, task time was significantly greater at delays of 500, 600, 800 and 1000 ms (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in error rates (p = 0.252). Conclusions Operators are capable of performing surgical exercises at significant delays. Latent video feedback is difficult for telesurgery. Visual or virtual reality cues should be implemented to aid the operator in a high‐cadence telesurgery environment. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1478-5951
1478-596X
DOI:10.1002/rcs.99