Ankle brachial index and intima media thickness predict cardiovascular events similarly and increased prediction when combined

Abstract Objective To compare the predictive value of the ankle brachial index (ABI) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) for cardiovascular events. Study Design and Setting Population-based cohort study. New cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, angina, and intermittent cla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2007-10, Vol.60 (10), p.1067-1075
Hauptverfasser: Price, Jackie F, Tzoulaki, Ioanna, Lee, Amanda J, Fowkes, F. Gerald R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To compare the predictive value of the ankle brachial index (ABI) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) for cardiovascular events. Study Design and Setting Population-based cohort study. New cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, angina, and intermittent claudication) were ascertained over a 12-year period in 1,007 men and women aged 60–79 and free of MI or stroke. Results The positive and negative predictive values for an ABI ≤ 0.9, an IMT ≥ 0.9 mm and for both tests abnormal were not substantially different. However, event rates in subjects with one test normal were increased when the alternate test proved positive (in people with a normal ABI test, 20.8% with an abnormal IMT developed MI/stroke compared with only 10.3% with a normal IMT). The area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) increased significantly between a model containing only age and sex (AUC 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55, 0.65) and that with either ABI (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.58, 0.69, P = 0.002) or IMT (AUC 0.62, 95% CI 0.57, 0.67, P = 0.005) added. The AUC increased further when both tests were added simultaneously (AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.60, 0.70, P < 0.001). Conclusion The ability of the ABI to predict cardiovascular disease was similar to that of the IMT. Combination of the two tests may be advantageous when the second test is applied to people with a negative first test and/or when the results are used as continuous variables.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.01.011