Platelet-rich plasma may not provide any additional effect when associated with guided bone regeneration around dental implants in dogs

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate histometrically bone healing in surgically created dehiscence‐type defects around titanium implants treated with an association of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Materials and Methods: Ten male adult mongrel dogs were u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2007-10, Vol.18 (5), p.649-654
Hauptverfasser: De Vasconcelos Gurgel, Bruno César, Gonçalves, Patrícia Furtado, Pimentel, Suzana Peres, Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi, Nociti Júnior, Francisco Humberto, Sallum, Enilson Antonio, Casati, Marcio Zaffalon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate histometrically bone healing in surgically created dehiscence‐type defects around titanium implants treated with an association of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Materials and Methods: Ten male adult mongrel dogs were used, from which the three low premolars (P2, P3, P4) and the first molar were extracted. Three months after teeth extraction, two implant sites were bilaterally drilled, buccal bone dehiscences were created and four titanium implants were placed. Dehiscences were randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) PRP, (2) GBR, (3) PRP+GBR and (4) control. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and the implants and adjacent hard tissues were processed for undecalcified sections. Bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC), bone density within the limits of implant threads (BW), bone density (BD) and new bone area (BA) in a zone lateral to the implant corresponding to bone defects were obtained and measured. Results: Intergroup analysis (two‐way ANOVA –α=5%) demonstrated that when PRP was utilized,no differences were observed for all parameters (P>0.05). However, significant differences were observed for BIC and BW toward membrane‐treated groups (P
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01383.x