Contraindications to regional anaesthesia in obstetrics: a survey of German practice

Background We assessed current practice regarding indications and contraindications to regional analgesia and anaesthesia for labour and delivery in Germany. Methods Questionnaires were mailed to the directors of 918 German departments of anaesthesiology. Results A total of 397 completed replies wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2007-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-335
Hauptverfasser: Stamer, U.M, Stuber, F, Wiese, R, Wulf, H, Meuser, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background We assessed current practice regarding indications and contraindications to regional analgesia and anaesthesia for labour and delivery in Germany. Methods Questionnaires were mailed to the directors of 918 German departments of anaesthesiology. Results A total of 397 completed replies were received representing 41.3% of all deliveries in Germany. More than half of the respondents never perform spinal or epidural anaesthesia when the platelet count falls below 65 × 109 /L. Preeclampsia, which was not graded for severity, was considered an absolute contraindication to regional block by 15% and placenta praevia by 30% of respondents. If a woman had taken aspirin three days before, the numbers of respondents considering epidural anaesthesia contraindicated (40.2%) were nearly double those considering spinal anaesthesia contraindicated (21.7%) ( P < 0.001). For a platelet count of 79 × 109 /L, epidural anaesthesia was thought to be contraindicated by 37% and spinal anaesthesia by 22.2% ( P = 0.001). In departments with 1000 deliveries/year. Conclusion Clinical practice varies considerably in Germany. Concerns regarding the use of regional blockade were more prevalent in hospitals with small delivery units. Indications and contraindications are not consistent in Germany and some recommendations or guidelines are needed.
ISSN:0959-289X
1532-3374
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.05.011