Prospective randomised single-blind controlled trial of glacial acetic acid versus glacial acetic acid, neomycin sulphate and dexamethasone spray in otitis externa and infected mastoid cavities

Objectives:  The literature reports the merits of antibacterial, antibiotic and steroid agents in treating otological infections but no controlled clinical trial has directly compared 2% glacial acetic acid (EarCalm; Stafford‐Miller Ltd, Brentford, UK) against 2% glacial acetic acid, 0.1% dexamethas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical otolaryngology 2006-12, Vol.31 (6), p.504-507
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, M.N., Flook, E.P., Mehta, D., Mortimore, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives:  The literature reports the merits of antibacterial, antibiotic and steroid agents in treating otological infections but no controlled clinical trial has directly compared 2% glacial acetic acid (EarCalm; Stafford‐Miller Ltd, Brentford, UK) against 2% glacial acetic acid, 0.1% dexamethasone and 3250 U/ml of neomycin sulphate (Otomize; Stafford‐Miller Ltd) in the treatment of otitis externa and infected mastoid cavities. Design:  Prospective, single‐blind randomised controlled trial. Setting:  Outpatients, Derby Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK. Patients:   Emergency and GP referrals with acute otitis externa (n = 53) and infected mastoid cavities (n = 56). Main outcome measures:  Otoscopy was performed at initial randomisation and then at 2 and 4 weeks, the ear assessed for active and inactive disease. Results:  Patients with active otitis externa, 71% (15/21) resolved with glacial acetic acid, dexamethasone and of neomycin sulphate after 2 weeks, increasing to 86% (18/21) after 4 weeks treatment. Patients on glacial acetic acid had only 38% (12/32) resolution after 4 weeks (P 
ISSN:1749-4478
1749-4486
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2273.2006.01318.x