Prospective randomised single-blind controlled trial of glacial acetic acid versus glacial acetic acid, neomycin sulphate and dexamethasone spray in otitis externa and infected mastoid cavities
Objectives: The literature reports the merits of antibacterial, antibiotic and steroid agents in treating otological infections but no controlled clinical trial has directly compared 2% glacial acetic acid (EarCalm; Stafford‐Miller Ltd, Brentford, UK) against 2% glacial acetic acid, 0.1% dexamethas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical otolaryngology 2006-12, Vol.31 (6), p.504-507 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: The literature reports the merits of antibacterial, antibiotic and steroid agents in treating otological infections but no controlled clinical trial has directly compared 2% glacial acetic acid (EarCalm; Stafford‐Miller Ltd, Brentford, UK) against 2% glacial acetic acid, 0.1% dexamethasone and 3250 U/ml of neomycin sulphate (Otomize; Stafford‐Miller Ltd) in the treatment of otitis externa and infected mastoid cavities.
Design: Prospective, single‐blind randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Outpatients, Derby Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK.
Patients: Emergency and GP referrals with acute otitis externa (n = 53) and infected mastoid cavities (n = 56).
Main outcome measures: Otoscopy was performed at initial randomisation and then at 2 and 4 weeks, the ear assessed for active and inactive disease.
Results: Patients with active otitis externa, 71% (15/21) resolved with glacial acetic acid, dexamethasone and of neomycin sulphate after 2 weeks, increasing to 86% (18/21) after 4 weeks treatment. Patients on glacial acetic acid had only 38% (12/32) resolution after 4 weeks (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1749-4478 1749-4486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2006.01318.x |