Measuring Eating Competence: Psychometric Properties and Validity of the ecSatter Inventory

Abstract Objective Assess validity of the ecSatter Inventory (ecSI) to measure eating competence (EC). Design Concurrent administration of ecSI with validated measures of eating behaviors using on-line and paper-pencil formats. Setting The on-line survey was completed by 370 participants; 462 comple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nutrition education and behavior 2007-09, Vol.39 (5), p.S154-S166
Hauptverfasser: Lohse, Barbara, PhD, RD, Satter, Ellyn, MS, RD, LCSW, BCD, Horacek, Tanya, PhD, RD, Gebreselassie, Tesfayi, PhD, Oakland, Mary Jane, PhD, RD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Assess validity of the ecSatter Inventory (ecSI) to measure eating competence (EC). Design Concurrent administration of ecSI with validated measures of eating behaviors using on-line and paper-pencil formats. Setting The on-line survey was completed by 370 participants; 462 completed the paper version. Participants Participants included 863 adults with 832 usable surveys from respondents (mean age 36.2 ± 13.4 years) without eating disorders, mostly female, white, educated, overweight, physically active, and food secure. Of those indicating intent to complete the on-line survey, 80.3% did so; 54% of mailed surveys were returned. Variables Measured Eating and food behaviors compared among EC tertiles and between dichotomous EC categories; internal consistency of ecSI. Analysis Analysis of variance, independent t tests, chi-square, factor analysis, logistic regression. Significance level was P < .05. Results Mean ecSI score was 31.1 ± 7.5. ecSI included 4 subscales with internal reliability and content validity. Construct validity was supported by specific behavioral profiles for ecSI tertiles and ecSI dichotomized categories. Persons unsatisfied with weight were 54% less likely to be EC; unit increase in the food like index was associated with nearly 3 times greater likelihood of being EC. Conclusions and Implications The ecSatter Inventory is a valid measure of EC and can be used for descriptive and outcome measurements.
ISSN:1499-4046
1878-2620
1708-8259
DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.371