Off label use of recombinant activated factor VII: a practice survey

To evaluate the impact of local recommendations on off label use of recombinant activated factor VII. Observational, retrospective. Recommendations have been diffused by a local working group in 2004, concerning seven groups of indications (traumatology, cardiac, hepatic and various surgeries, obste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annales françaises d'anesthésie et de réanimation 2007-09, Vol.26 (9), p.774-779
Hauptverfasser: Delannoy, B, Levrat, A, Chamouard, V, Aulagner, G, Perdrix, J-P, Négrier, C, Allaouchiche, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the impact of local recommendations on off label use of recombinant activated factor VII. Observational, retrospective. Recommendations have been diffused by a local working group in 2004, concerning seven groups of indications (traumatology, cardiac, hepatic and various surgeries, obstetrics, neurology and haematology). Conformity to recommendations was studied according to 4 axes: respect of prescribing procedure, indication, posology, and pre ones required with the administration. There were thirty-one uses from 2004 to 2006. Thirty patients presented a massive haemorrhage (blood products before administration of recombinant activated factor VII expressed in median [min-max]: red blood cell unit=15 [0-37], fresh frozen plasma=11 [0-21]). Gravity score at the admission: SAPSII=55+/-22 (average+/-SD), 87% patients presented haemorrhagic shock. Prescribing procedure was in conformity with recommendations in 45%, indications were correct in 74%, posology in 55%, and 16% of prescriptions were completely conform. With the tariffing to the activity reform, the reimbursement of off label use of expensive molecules will depend on the respect of the evidence-based medicine. According to this study, the observance of local recommendations was insufficient. Rationalizing prescriptions for practice improvement seemed to be difficult and challenging.
ISSN:1769-6623
DOI:10.1016/j.annfar.2007.06.001