Clinical Outcome in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients who Interrupted Imatinib after Achieving Stable Disease or Better Response

Background Imatinib has been found to be effective in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We sought to evaluate the clinical outcome of imatinib interruption in GIST patients who had achieved stable disease (SD) or showed better response to imatinib therapy. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2006-11, Vol.36 (11), p.704-711
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jae-Lyun, Ryu, Min-Hee, Chang, Heung Moon, Kim, Tae Won, Kang, Hye Jin, Sohn, Hee Jung, Lee, Jung Shin, Kang, Yoon-Koo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Imatinib has been found to be effective in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We sought to evaluate the clinical outcome of imatinib interruption in GIST patients who had achieved stable disease (SD) or showed better response to imatinib therapy. Methods From July 2001 to December 2004, we prospectively collected clinical data from 62 consecutive patients with advanced GIST, of whom 58 (93.5%) achieved SD or better response to imatinib therapy and were included in this study. Imatinib therapy was interrupted in 14 of the 58 patients (interruption group, INT), after a median time of 11.9 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) after imatinib interruption was calculated and imatinib-refractory PFS and overall survival (OS) were compared between the INT group and the 44 patients who continued imatinib treatment (continuation group, CONT). Results After a median follow-up of 17.9 months following imatinib interruption, nine patients (64%) had progressive disease (PD) with a median PFS from the date of imatinib interruption of 10.0 months. Median PFS dated from the time of imatinib initiation in the INT group was 21.8 months (95% CI, 17.3–26.3 months), but was not reached in the CONT group (P=0.029). Following imatinib reintroduction in the INT group, 88% of patients achieved disease control. There were no statistically significant differences in imatinib-refractory PFS (P=0.405) and OS (P=0.498) between the groups. Conclusion In GIST patients controlled with imatinib, treatment might be interrupted, at least temporarily, when clinically warranted.
ISSN:0368-2811
1465-3621
DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyl088